Wednesday, April 30, 2008

What’s Ethical About Omission?

Main stream media reveals itself as one of the most uninformed purveyors of news. It emphasizes repeatedly that there are only three candidates for President, which is a blatant falsehood. It addresses the issues and pretends to include all the possible perspectives but it always skips the most obvious and most truthful perspective for each of the issues. That perspective is the one that is Constitutional!

This practice is called omission and it is unethical.

The only reason main stream media even addresses the main issues of the horrors of war and of the collapse of the economy is because they are larger than life, and if they would ignore them, like their overlords would cherish, the people would surely see how servile main stream media is to the corrupt power elite.

The other tactic of omission used by main stream media is to cover ‘good news’ items. They put the ‘feel-good’ reports in and even claim to be being responsive to their listeners. How convenient! Instead of giving time for real substance to the very serious and overwhelmingly important issues - the collapsing economy and the horrors of war - they wander about and give the appearance of being interested in pursuing the news.

But the news is right there in front of them and they choose to omit it! This is blatantly unethical and it is shameful.

Will these same ‘news’ outlets ignore the best-selling success of The Revolution: A Manifesto? Will they cower and whisper in back rooms and deliberately scheme to hide the usurpation of our Constitutional Republic by the ego-driven interventionists? Will they shake in their boots when the message of classical liberalism is trumpeted by the great statesman of our time - Ron Paul?

There is nothing ethical about the omission practiced by main stream media.

For more information go to .

Sunday, April 20, 2008

The Constitution Is A Greater Measure Than Is Character!

The issue is not whether a particular person is perfect or not. It is a universally known fact that no human being is perfect. That does not mean that there are not some who are more virtuous than others, but still no one is perfect.

Which means that the real criteria for evaluating a candidate for any public office in America is not their relative perfections or imperfections but rather it is whether they abide by the Constitution. After all, the Constitution is the covenant that clearly distinguishes between those who are ego-driven and those who are humble servants interested in liberty and justice.

If a person has flaws (and inevitably he or she does) but meticulously and sincerely stays within the bounds given by the Constitution there is a healthy separation such that the people are served without the possibility of any of their personal flaws spilling out to the detriment of others. The Constitution protects individual liberties and guarantees property rights.

Those who violate the ‘covenant’ (one that is well documented and known as the Constitution) have no boundary to offer us protection from their imperfections. In fact if they are unprincipled enough to discard the Constitution they are already dangerously unscrupulous and ego-driven. Once the ego gets ahold of these unconstrained violators of the Constitution and they are given political power there will be no end to their interventionist ambitions.

So apply the test!

Is the candidate, in both words and deeds, unwaveringly dedicated to upholding and defending the Constitution? If not then their personal flaws will spill into your life!

Apply the test to Ron Paul!

For more information go to .